Assemblywoman Viviana Veloz, a member of the opposition, urged lawmakers to permit the method to proceed “so that after and for all, it’s completely clear, this trial has a political nature.”
Tuesday’s vote signifies that Lasso’s accusers and his protection might be allowed to current proof earlier than the Nationwide Meeting. To take away the president, a minimum of 92 of the Meeting’s 137 members — greater than two-thirds — must vote in favor later this month.
At any time throughout the course of, Lasso may transfer to dissolve the Meeting and govern by decree with the management of the Constitutional Courtroom for as much as six months, after which he must name for brand new presidential and legislative elections.
Whereas lawmakers accuse the president of embezzlement, they haven’t provided proof of the accusation, and on Saturday, the Legislative Oversight Fee issued a report that cleared Lasso. However 5 of the 9 commision members voted to not approve the report.
Edgar Neira, Lasso’s lawyer, informed the Teleamazonas tv community that the lawmakers’ transfer has no authorized foundation. The Meeting can’t train an influence “that’s not established within the structure and the legislation,” Neira mentioned.
Assemblywoman Viviana Veloz, a member of the opposition, urged lawmakers to permit the method to proceed “so that after and for all, it’s completely clear, this trial has a political nature.”
Tuesday’s vote signifies that Lasso’s accusers and his protection might be allowed to current proof earlier than the Nationwide Meeting. To take away the president, a minimum of 92 of the Meeting’s 137 members — greater than two-thirds — must vote in favor later this month.
At any time throughout the course of, Lasso may transfer to dissolve the Meeting and govern by decree with the management of the Constitutional Courtroom for as much as six months, after which he must name for brand new presidential and legislative elections.
Whereas lawmakers accuse the president of embezzlement, they haven’t provided proof of the accusation, and on Saturday, the Legislative Oversight Fee issued a report that cleared Lasso. However 5 of the 9 commision members voted to not approve the report.
Edgar Neira, Lasso’s lawyer, informed the Teleamazonas tv community that the lawmakers’ transfer has no authorized foundation. The Meeting can’t train an influence “that’s not established within the structure and the legislation,” Neira mentioned.
Assemblywoman Viviana Veloz, a member of the opposition, urged lawmakers to permit the method to proceed “so that after and for all, it’s completely clear, this trial has a political nature.”
Tuesday’s vote signifies that Lasso’s accusers and his protection might be allowed to current proof earlier than the Nationwide Meeting. To take away the president, a minimum of 92 of the Meeting’s 137 members — greater than two-thirds — must vote in favor later this month.
At any time throughout the course of, Lasso may transfer to dissolve the Meeting and govern by decree with the management of the Constitutional Courtroom for as much as six months, after which he must name for brand new presidential and legislative elections.
Whereas lawmakers accuse the president of embezzlement, they haven’t provided proof of the accusation, and on Saturday, the Legislative Oversight Fee issued a report that cleared Lasso. However 5 of the 9 commision members voted to not approve the report.
Edgar Neira, Lasso’s lawyer, informed the Teleamazonas tv community that the lawmakers’ transfer has no authorized foundation. The Meeting can’t train an influence “that’s not established within the structure and the legislation,” Neira mentioned.
Assemblywoman Viviana Veloz, a member of the opposition, urged lawmakers to permit the method to proceed “so that after and for all, it’s completely clear, this trial has a political nature.”
Tuesday’s vote signifies that Lasso’s accusers and his protection might be allowed to current proof earlier than the Nationwide Meeting. To take away the president, a minimum of 92 of the Meeting’s 137 members — greater than two-thirds — must vote in favor later this month.
At any time throughout the course of, Lasso may transfer to dissolve the Meeting and govern by decree with the management of the Constitutional Courtroom for as much as six months, after which he must name for brand new presidential and legislative elections.
Whereas lawmakers accuse the president of embezzlement, they haven’t provided proof of the accusation, and on Saturday, the Legislative Oversight Fee issued a report that cleared Lasso. However 5 of the 9 commision members voted to not approve the report.
Edgar Neira, Lasso’s lawyer, informed the Teleamazonas tv community that the lawmakers’ transfer has no authorized foundation. The Meeting can’t train an influence “that’s not established within the structure and the legislation,” Neira mentioned.
